Staff Report

According to a guide released by the Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana summarizing the proposed amendments for this year’s election, Louisiana voters are set to have a significant say in potential changes to the state constitution. These changes focus on the allocation of federal funds for coastal protection and adjustments to the budget approval process for legislators.

This spring, the Legislature greenlit five amendments, with one admendment featured on the ballot for the November 5 general election and four slated for the December 7 runoff. Here’s a closer look:

November 5: Amendment 1

What it proposes: Should federal revenue from alternative or renewable energy production in the Outer Continental Shelf be deposited into the Coastal Protection and Restoration Fund?

Why it’s important: This fund finances essential projects such as levees, floodgates, and wetland restoration to combat Louisiana’s coastal erosion. Opponents argue that further restrictions on fund allocations might jeopardize funding for healthcare and education.

Voting FOR means: These federal funds would be exclusively used for coastal protection efforts.

Voting AGAINST means: The money would go into the general fund, leaving it open for various state expenses.

December 7: Amendment 1

What it proposes: Should the Supreme Court be empowered to sanction judges after investigations by the judiciary commission?

Why it matters: This amendment seeks to add five politically appointed members to the Judiciary Commission, which oversees judicial conduct. It would also broaden the Supreme Court’s authority to initiate investigations into judicial misconduct.

Voting FOR means: The commission’s oversight capacity would be enhanced, allowing for more rigorous accountability.

Voting AGAINST means: The existing structure would remain unchanged, limiting the Supreme Court’s disciplinary actions to recommendations from the commission.

Amendment 2

What it proposes: Should lawmakers be required to wait at least 48 hours before voting on budget amendments?

Why it’s significant: This proposal stems from the chaotic conclusion of the 2023 legislative session, when critical budget bills were passed without adequate review. This amendment aims to ensure lawmakers have time to assess financial implications.

Voting FOR means: A mandatory 48-hour review period for budget bills would be implemented.

Voting AGAINST means: Lawmakers would still be able to vote without waiting, potentially leading to rushed decisions.

Amendment 3

What it proposes: Should the Legislature be allowed to extend regular sessions by up to six days to finalize budget bills?

Why it’s relevant: This amendment complements Amendment 2, alleviating concerns about meeting budget deadlines while establishing a required review period.

Voting FOR means: Lawmakers could extend sessions as needed for budget approval.

Voting AGAINST means: The legislative calendar would remain as is, with no extensions permitted.

Amendment 4

What it proposes: Should mandatory tax sales for unpaid property taxes be abolished, allowing the legislature to create new procedures?

Why it’s crucial: The current tax sale process has faced legal challenges regarding due process for property owners. A recent Supreme Court ruling adds urgency to reassessing this system.

Voting FOR means: A shift to a tax lien auction process would be implemented for unpaid taxes.

Voting AGAINST means: The current tax sale system would continue to be in effect.

Make sure to educate yourself on these important amendments ahead of the upcoming elections!